First person, tell us what happenedWrite freely somewhere the other person can't see.

My name/nickname (optional — shown in the result)

What do you want to say? (the more detail, the more accurate the ruling)

Now it's the other person's turnHand the screen over. What you wrote won't be shown to them.

Wait — this isn't something to treat as fun

If there's been physical threats or violence, this isn't something this tool should judge. Please don't handle this alone — reach out to one of the resources below.

📞 National Domestic Violence Hotline (US)

1-800-799-7233

📞 Crisis Text Line

Text HOME to 741741

📞 Emergency

911 (or your local emergency number)

5 judges are reading what you both wrote...

This can take up to 20 seconds.

Verdict –

How do the 5 judges decide?

How it works

Each person writes their side and answers 6 multiple-choice questions. An AI reads that directly and rules from the perspective of 5 judges with different personalities. The Empathetic judge looks at who got hurt more; the Principled judge looks at whether a promise was broken and whether it's a repeat pattern. The Blunt judge only trusts what you admit to yourself, and the Reconciling judge cares less about fault than about what to do next. If there's no clear-cut fault, the judges won't force a side.

Why does each person write separately?

Because hearing only one side skews the ruling. What the first person writes stays hidden from the other, and when multiple-choice answers conflict, the tool trusts the side who admitted their own fault more.

What this doesn't do

This is for-fun reference content, not a legal or psychological judgment. Since it only works from what's written, any missing context isn't reflected. If there's physical threat or violence, it switches to support-resource guidance instead of ruling — that's not something to treat as fun. What you write is sent to an AI for judging and is not stored.